‘Middlemarch’ by George Eliot

September 8, 2015 at 12:50 am 2 comments

9780141199795I have rarely felt as rewarded and accomplished at the end of a book as I did when I finished Middlemarch. And for good reason — my copy was 889 pages of dense copy, filled with romance, politics, intrigue and a lot of historical issues that, sadly, made little to no sense to me.

Middlemarch is George Eliot’s fourth novel, and was originally published in eight installments in 1871 or so. The novel contains two main plot arcs: one concerning Dorothea Brooke, a young woman faced with an interesting choice regarding her marriage, and the other concerning a young man named Tertius Lydgate, a doctor who arrives in Middlemarch with grand plans and ideas. The two are eventually connected by the story of Nicholas Bulstrode, a staunch Methodist about whom little else is known.

It’s a testament to the magnificence of this novel that, despite its addressing many political issues of the early 19th century, I found something true and applicable to today in nearly every chapter. Eliot was a student not only of history (she was writing about the 1830s while living in the 1870s), but of human nature, and the ways in which humans “make do” with what they are given.

One major theme running throughout the novel is that of marriage. It’s fascinating to read about Rosamund Vincy, who debates throughout the novel the merits of her marriage to Lydgate and what her options are in the case of a failure of the marriage. What can she do?

Not much, is the answer, and Eliot shines a light on Rosamund’s paramount desire to be constantly admired (albeit from afar) by everyone she comes across — something she can’t find in her marriage. Rosamund’s predicament underscores the idea that sometimes, marriage is entered into with rose-colored glasses. Dorothea, perhaps, expresses it best, when she implies that marriage so often causes the death of that innocent, perfect admiration by bringing two people so close together that their flaws cannot but become obvious.

Dorothea knows whereof she speaks, having married a man whom she believed to be perfect only to find that he had no interest in her mind, her ambitions, her desire to help people or anything apart from her youth (which he thought might be nice to have around the house). She also finds that her husband, whom she admired for the great scholarly works he was supposedly producing, is actually entirely wrong regarding his subject matter and hopelessly behind the times. In short, everything she dreamed of has died as a result of her marriage — and, she says later, it’s like “living with a murder.”

Happily, things end well for Dorothea, eventually. But one can’t help but recognize her story as a cautionary tale — that entering into marriage under the impression that one’s future spouse is perfect, without finding any evidence to the contrary, is not such a great idea. Dorothea knows so little of her husband before the wedding that she fills in the gaps in her mind with the best possible outcome, leading to intense disappointment.

This lesson is further underscored by the only unequivocally happy ending in the novel: the marriage of Fred Vincy and Mary Garth. The two of them have known each other since childhood and are familiar with every single flaw in each other; Mary loves to tease and won’t tolerate being bossed around, and Fred can be lazy, spendthrift and has very little in the way of what we’d call “marketable skills.” However, these two are exemplars in that they recognize each other’s flaws, love one another in spite of those imperfections, and allow that love to inspire them to become worthy of one another. Mary remains patient, defying her parents and refusing to make a “sensible” match, while Fred strives to find a career with the potential to support a family.

I suppose, in the end, the lesson here is that everyone gets what they deserve…but as a natural consequence of their own actions, not as something handed to them from on high.

So. Despite the somewhat dense political themes running through the novel — many of which will be incomprehensible to the average modern reader — this is definitely a book worth reading. George Eliot has what I will always think of as that “Margaret Atwood” quality: the ability to create certain sentences that ring so true that you can’t help but read them several times, then dog-ear the page so you can find them later.


Entry filed under: Classics. Tags: , , , .

On balance and reading A reading pickle: Despising the characters, intrigued by the story

2 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Sheryl  |  September 29, 2015 at 4:01 pm

    I’ve been meaning to reply to this for ages. Thanks for a lovely post on an amazing book.

    Of course I am sure you are aware that Middlemarch was an Anti-clemmer Society book group read. It seems that we were equally split with either hating or enjoying the political themes. Made for dense reading for me at first, but I spent some time reading up on them, and it turns out it made my reading that much more interesting.

    Elliot was writing about parliamentary voting reforms that took place about 40 years before she wrote the book, as a commentary on contemporary reform measures….

    Loved it. But then again I am a history person. And I don’t forget how dense those sections were for me before my research!

    • 2. Kate  |  September 29, 2015 at 4:15 pm

      Thank you, Sheryl! Yes, I do think that if I had spent more time researching Elliot’s political themes, it would have enriched my reading. Something for next time, I guess?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed

Connect with LT

literarytransgressions (Gmail)

@LitTransgressor (Twitter)

LT RSS feed (Subscribe)

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 134 other followers


LT Archives

In accordance with FTC regulations…

...we must disclose that we are independent bloggers with no ties to authors, publishers, or advertisers. We are not given books or monetary compensation in return for favorable reviews or publicity.

Where we have received advance or complementary copies of books, it will be noted in the body of the entry, and will not affect our review or opinions in the slightest.

%d bloggers like this: