Zadie Smith and “comeuppance stories”

March 20, 2014 at 6:11 am 5 comments

schadenfreudeA few years ago, author Zadie Smith gave an interview about NW where she noted that “The question of whether people ‘get what they deserve'” is a central and serious question for all readers. She continued, “…in the end it’s a very serious ethical question. Whether you believe that or not creates all kind of political difference and moral difference so I don’t want to enter into it. The book was written exactly for that reason, to create a little problem you enter and solve for yourself.”

Personally, I’ve always been huge comeuppance reader—I love schadenfreude and I love when characters “get what they deserve.” It’s tidy and it lets you walk away from a story feeling like everything went according to plan.

That said, the more I thought about Zadie Smith’s words, the more I realized how boring comeuppance stories (if you will) can be. If you can tell who the bad character is and who the good character is so easily that their just desserts are completely satisfying, how simple and how mundane was the story? 

Comeuppance stories can be fun and tremendously entertaining, particularly when you’re looking for just that—entertainment over mental exercise. Some of my favorite books are essentially comeuppance stories (Crocodile on the Sandbank springs to mind). But how often do you think about a comeuppance story after you’ve finished it? Does it linger in your mind, puzzling and challenging you even days later? Most often, the answer is no.

So, yes, this is an interesting question for all readers to consider, but I don’t think it’s actually an ethical question, as Smith posits (I can’t really see choosing to enjoy just desserts or not in literature reflecting back on your moral fiber). Rather, it’s a question about how challenged you want to be by your reading material. For me, I know that answer changes daily, even hourly, depending on my mood. But it’s still valuable to stop and consider, even reconsider, what you’re reading and why. Are you being entertained or are you being engaged?

Advertisements

Entry filed under: Musings and Essays. Tags: , , , .

The Wolf Gift by Anne Rice “The best moments in reading”

5 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Kate  |  March 20, 2014 at 12:05 pm

    Love it! I was just thinking about how to write about “Vanity Fair” — part of the reason it’s compelling is because it’s not a straight comeuppance story, and it makes you struggle a little with that concept. Thanks for sharing this!

    Reply
    • 2. Corey  |  March 25, 2014 at 10:31 am

      Thanks! It’s harder to wrap the mind around non-comeuppance stories, I think, and thus often harder to decide if you as a reader enjoyed it (vs possibly appreciating it, but not loving it?)! Did you enjoy/appreciate Vanity Fair? It’s been on my TBR list for ages!

      Reply
  • 3. Susie Paul  |  March 21, 2014 at 12:26 pm

    The reason I love Donna Tartt’s The Goldlfinch is that its protagonist is so flawed and he does and does not get what he deserves. All sorts of ambiguities!

    Reply
    • 4. Kate  |  March 21, 2014 at 12:28 pm

      Susie, I have been meaning to read that! Now that’s going to the top of my list :)

      Reply
  • 5. The Cormoran Strike novels | Literary Transgressions  |  February 16, 2015 at 7:21 am

    […] in a while, so I forgot how purely enjoyable they could be. They are the most satisfying kind of “comeuppance stories” — the villains are inevitably caught by our intrepid and intelligent heroes and heroines, […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Connect with LT

literarytransgressions (Gmail)

@LitTransgressor (Twitter)

LT RSS feed (Subscribe)

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 132 other followers

Categories

LT Archives

In accordance with FTC regulations…

...we must disclose that we are independent bloggers with no ties to authors, publishers, or advertisers. We are not given books or monetary compensation in return for favorable reviews or publicity.

Where we have received advance or complementary copies of books, it will be noted in the body of the entry, and will not affect our review or opinions in the slightest.


%d bloggers like this: