Raffles and Bunny; or, the poor man’s Holmes

June 3, 2010 at 12:10 am 3 comments

Like Corey, I  am in the midst of moving. Through the harrowing process of deciding which books get to make the move with me, which stay at my parents’ house and which get listed on Amazon, I came across a small book with an intriguing title: Raffles: The Amateur Cracksman.*

I had picked this book up in a used bookstore maybe a year ago, but had never managed to find the time for it. The protagonists’ silly names were reason enough to at least skim the story, but my interest was piqued after I read the back cover.

The main story is that A. J. Raffles and his old school friend Bunny Manders (oddly identified as “Danvers” in my copy) maintain the lifestyle expected of Victorian gentleman by robbing their neighbors blind. Raffles also plays cricket and Bunny writes, but these occupations do not pay very well — at least not well enough to keep the men in brandy and Sullivan cigars.

Readers will recognize certain aspects of Sherlock Holmes in this and the following “Raffles” novels; author E. W. Hornung was married to Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s sister, and was close with the man himself. The relationship between Raffles and Bunny is similar to Holmes and Watson’s, and Raffles (like Holmes) always manages to stay about three steps ahead of his companion when unraveling a tricky situation.

This latter technique makes for some awkward writing. Often, Bunny narrates an episode without knowing what is going on, and Raffles must explain the heist to him after the action has occurred. One example is the theft of a large golden cup from the British Museum. Bunny is sent out of the room as a lookout at a crucial moment, and the reader never gets to see how Raffles actually commits the crime. Surely it’s more exciting to see a crime committed than hear about it afterward!

That said, this book made for some excellent reading. If I saw any of its sequels on a bookstore shelf , I’d snatch them up in a second — and fans of Sir Arthur Conan Doyle (or any Victorian mysteries) are likely to feel the same way.

*To clarify, my edition combined the stories in the 1899 collection entitled Raffles: The Amateur Cracksman with a later collection of stories, published in 1901 under the title Raffles: Further Adventures of the Amateur Cracksman.

–KT

Advertisements

Entry filed under: Classics, Mystery. Tags: , .

Moving Books Rereadings: (Some of) the Harry Potter Series

3 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Corey  |  June 3, 2010 at 10:54 am

    Well this sounds right up my alley. Thanks for the recommendation!

    Reply
    • 2. KT  |  June 3, 2010 at 8:49 pm

      No prob! It IS right up your alley — the Boer War even makes an appearance. I need to find “A Thief in the Night,” which comprises even more more wacky Bunny and Raffles adventures!

      Reply
      • 3. Corey  |  June 4, 2010 at 9:40 am

        Well the names certainly kick some serious butt so add the Boer War and a dash of Victorianism and I am so there! :D

        Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Connect with LT

literarytransgressions (Gmail)

@LitTransgressor (Twitter)

LT RSS feed (Subscribe)

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 135 other followers

Categories

LT Archives

In accordance with FTC regulations…

...we must disclose that we are independent bloggers with no ties to authors, publishers, or advertisers. We are not given books or monetary compensation in return for favorable reviews or publicity.

Where we have received advance or complementary copies of books, it will be noted in the body of the entry, and will not affect our review or opinions in the slightest.


%d bloggers like this: