Déjà Dead by Kathy Reichs

April 27, 2010 at 12:00 am 10 comments


The most appropriate word to use when describing anthropologist Kathy Reichs’ Déjà Dead is “gripping.” And it’s true. I could not put it down. Unfortunately, I mean this in the “I’m so terrified I can’t go to sleep and oh dear god I just want this to be over NOW” sense of the word.

For those of you familiar with the television show “Bones,” you know both Reichs and the character Temperance Brennan well. Reichs is herself a forensic anthropologist and popular novelist whose books focus on another forensic anthropologist (Brennan) who solves murders based on the physical evidence found in the victim’s bones. It should be duly noted—since I think many of the books’ new readers come via the show—that the television show and the books bear little resemblance aside from the main character having the same name. Book-Brennan and TV-Brennan are two entirely different women. (Apparently TV-Brennan is based on Reichs personally rather than on Book-Brennan and just stole the name.) Similarly, even though they share a premise, the books and the TV show have two entirely different tones to fit their different protagonists.

Déjà Dead is the first of Reichs’ novels and, as I said, it is undeniably gripping. It is also gruesome and creepy. For some reason seeing half-decomposed skeletal remains and reading a description of them are two very different things and I can now tell you the latter is by far the more unpleasant. Reichs’ anthropologically-correct descriptions of the mutilations suffered by the victims in Déjà Dead (amplified by Brennan’s empathy towards the victims) are terrifying. Her further descriptions of the hunt for the man responsible (which gets increasingly personal to our heroine) are horror film worthy. This book is perhaps literally a mystery, but it would more accurately be placed in the horror genre.

I must say that, prior to Déjà Dead, I never truly realized how scary someone doing something alone is. Even the scenes in Brennan’s apartment (eating dinner, watching TV, feeding her cat) were tense and I could barely relax after the scene was over and she was back in the lab the next morning. Every trip to the gym alone caused my muscles to tighten and every time she couldn’t reach someone on the phone made me stop breathing. Perhaps I’m easily frightened and should stick to Victorian mysteries, but this book had me petrified. I literally could not move.

So does this mean it was a good, scary book? I guess I would grudgingly say yes. I was definitely scared, so that speaks to the book’s abilities in that regard. However, I did not find Reichs’ prose to be remotely enjoyable; her style is mostly to use short fragmented sentences that serve as Brennan’s stream-of-consciousness musings on case files, men’s butts, and worry about various people close to her. (Book-Brennan is also impossibly prickly. Whenever she does something recklessly stupid—which is surprisingly often for someone so supposedly intelligent—and gets berated, she first gets sulky, then blames the patriarchy, and then suddenly explodes yelling at whoever is trying to help her. At least TV-Brennan can be relied upon to remain rational in these situations.)

Style-wise, I also detested Reichs’ affection for ending chapters with something dramatic like “And then I knew. I knew where he was. I grabbed my keys.” and then opening the next chapter with something like “Normally, I wouldn’t eat Cajun food twice in one week, but I was damn hungry.” She eventually gets around to telling you what happened in between the keys and the Cajun food but while there is something to be said for suspense, I’ll take mine in a more natural format rather than these forced cliff-hangers.

Unsurprisingly, Reichs’ best quality as an author is making forensic findings digestible and making it all make sense to the layman (me). Those parts were well-done and interesting, even if what Book-Brennan was able to figure out from skeletal remains pales beside the crazy things TV-Brennan is able to suss out. (Book-Brennan has the bonus of being undoubtedly more realistic in this way. The ludicrousness of what TV-Brennan can deduce often has me rolling my eyes.)

On the whole, I would probably not recommend Déjà Dead unless you have an affection for horror films and like your books in a similar tone. As a fan of the television “Bones,” I’m vaguely glad I can now compare the two, but I did not enjoy reading this book nor will I be continuing on to read more of Reichs’ stories. Instead, I’m going to focus my anthropological energies on “Bones” and continue enjoying the characters and dialogue to be found there. Who would have thought the film version of these crimes would be less disturbing than the written one? I guess props to Reichs for her ability to horrify, but that isn’t enough to make me suggest this book to anyone.

–Corey

Advertisements

Entry filed under: Contemporary Fiction, Mystery. Tags: , , , , , .

May’s Challenge! Free (yes really) Books

10 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Natalie  |  April 27, 2010 at 2:05 pm

    Thanks for reading and reviewing this! I shall now stay far, far away from it and remain a TV-Brennan fan only.

    Reply
    • 2. Corey  |  April 28, 2010 at 5:10 am

      I think that is an extremely wise decision!

      Reply
  • 3. KT  |  April 27, 2010 at 7:19 pm

    Wow. I’m with Natalie — I love Bones so much that I’d rather stay away from this series. Thanks for reading it for our sakes!

    Reply
    • 4. Corey  |  April 28, 2010 at 5:10 am

      Ha, no problem! This way only one of us has to be shaking in her boots. : )

      Reply
  • 5. limewire  |  April 30, 2010 at 12:51 am

    dang amazing stuff dude.

    Reply
  • […] This is mystery at its Conan Doylesque best rather than some mash-up of horror and mystery that is far more common on the mystery shelves these days. Perhaps unsurprisingly, I’d highly recommend this book to […]

    Reply
  • 7. Shannon  |  May 22, 2011 at 9:27 am

    Actually I would have to disagree with you. I love the show Bones, therefore, over the winter I decide to read her books and I truly enjoyed it. Though their are quite a few differences, I can see were they got the inspiration from and I find it very interesting. I Hate Horror films so to say you would have to be that type of person is not true. Though the book becomes scary at times, there is nothing that would make me jump.

    It is actually kinda of interesting in the show how the writers often poke fun of the books themselves, cracking jokes just for those who love Kathy Reichs work.

    So people should not stay away from the books. The first is a little more mature but the scary factor is only a tinny factor.

    Reply
    • 8. Corey  |  May 22, 2011 at 10:54 am

      You are perfectly welcome to disagree with my review—in fact, I’m quite pleased to hear that you did enjoy these books as much as I wanted to going in—but please do remember the subjectivity of readings and feelings about any given book. Everyone has their own personal reaction to books and this was just mine.

      In this particular case, I am apparently more easily creeped out than other people, so I did not enjoy this book and did find it quite scary. But that is just me and, like I said, I’m very happy to hear you are not the same way! Lots of people do enjoy Kathy Reichs’ books and I don’t think they’re wrong to do so; I just couldn’t join in the enjoyment myself, alas. As a fan of “Bones,” I very much wanted to!

      Reply
  • […] reminds one a lot of Temperance “Bones” Brennan and Sheldon Cooper, two other socially-inept scientists from the pop culture realm who likely have […]

    Reply
  • 10. The Cormoran Strike novels | Literary Transgressions  |  February 16, 2015 at 7:21 am

    […] of historical mysteries into the contemporary mystery/thriller genre. The last time I delved down this particular path, I came away rather disappointed and a little disgusted (somehow contemporary mysteries really […]

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Connect with LT

literarytransgressions (Gmail)

@LitTransgressor (Twitter)

LT RSS feed (Subscribe)

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 135 other followers

Categories

LT Archives

In accordance with FTC regulations…

...we must disclose that we are independent bloggers with no ties to authors, publishers, or advertisers. We are not given books or monetary compensation in return for favorable reviews or publicity.

Where we have received advance or complementary copies of books, it will be noted in the body of the entry, and will not affect our review or opinions in the slightest.


%d bloggers like this: