Cover that up

November 13, 2007 at 6:00 pm Leave a comment

So I have to write a paper on disguise in 18th-century literature. I love disguise. I even kind of love 18th-century literature, so this topic is actually pretty exciting. What I don’t like is the page limit, because 4-6 pages is just not going to be enough to spout all my thoughts on masking and taking on other identities.

My favorite book about disguise is not 18th century, but rather a retelling of the Cupid and Psyche myth called Til We Have Faces by C. S. Lewis. The main character, because she is not as beautiful as her sister Psyche, but extremely smart and a kick-ass Queen, decides to hide her face behind a veil. She comments on how most of her subjects cannot imagine that behind the veil is just an ugly woman; they say she’s a goddess, or so beautiful that her face would stun anyone who looked on it, or that she’s faceless, or any number of things except the simplest explanation.

That’s the awesome thing about disguise in literature. Characters get to try on someone else’s life or identity for a while, and basically become whomever they want. How they react and how other characters react to them says a lot about their personalities and motives, and I know more than once Shakespeare has used disguise to show characters’ stupidity or malleability.

But often characters go into these other personas thinking they’ll have unlimited freedom, and they just don’t get it. They have rules and restrictions placed on them that they didn’t expect. The Queen in Lewis’s book is free from the stigma she’d receive if she were ugly, and endowed with a divine status by her more superstitious subjects. But she can never lift that veil, as it makes her Queen. Once she’s put it on, she cannot revert to her status as an individual with faults and feelings like anyone else.

She has to supercede these limitations and own her original identity, though. The Queen takes a spiritual journey through her sister’s trials — her search for herself is connected with Psyche’s search for Cupid. They’re two halves of a whole, and the meaning of Psyche’s name (“soul”), makes her representative of her sister’s soul and identity.

That’s true of anyone who disguises him or herself in literature; they always have to return to their own identity when all is said and done, and it’s only when that happens that the world is right again.

Which, I guess, brings me back to Joseph Campbell’s hero’s journey…which is another topic for another blog post. :)

Advertisements

Entry filed under: Musings and Essays.

Cinderelly, Cinderelly ‘Tis the season for Dickens

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


Connect with LT

literarytransgressions (Gmail)

@LitTransgressor (Twitter)

LT RSS feed (Subscribe)

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 135 other followers

Categories

LT Archives

In accordance with FTC regulations…

...we must disclose that we are independent bloggers with no ties to authors, publishers, or advertisers. We are not given books or monetary compensation in return for favorable reviews or publicity.

Where we have received advance or complementary copies of books, it will be noted in the body of the entry, and will not affect our review or opinions in the slightest.


%d bloggers like this: